Encryption & copyright
What's the price of a song played online? Seven-hundredths of a penny, according to the U.S. Librarian of Congress.
The rate is substantially less than that proposed in February by the Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panel, which would have charged Internet-only broadcasters twice the amount AM or FM stations would pay to retransmit their broadcasts online.
At that price, compulsory royalty payments will mean most streaming-audio online "radio" stations won't make it -- at least not without charging users. Even the largest Internet radio presence, Live365 Inc., which operates a network of about 30,000 stations, would be forced to shell out approximately $100,000 per month, its vice president John Jeffrey told the Associated Press. Joe D'Angelo at VH1.COM has the story. Internet broadcasters such as Beethoven.com were stunned by the ruling, San Jose Mercury News columnist Dawn C. Chmielewski wrote. Predictable, the Associated Press found the record industry saying the price was too low (it had hoped for four-tenths of a cent) and the online industry saying it was too high. It is an arcane aspect of U.S. copyright law that the Librarian of Congress sets rates for what Internet broadcasters must pay for the privilege of streaming copyrighted music online.
Insiders had predicted before the LoC's decision that the rates being considered would put some Web broadcasters out of business. James Turner of the Christian Science Monitor has been following the story. YOu can also read the Wall Street Journal's article by Jeff Bater if you're a WSJ-registered user.
Screen Digest reported in a May study that in April 2001, the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) and the Digital Media Association (DiMA) submitted proposals to the U.S. Copyright Officer concerning the royalty rates webcasters should pay. The DiMA proposed a rate of $0.0015 per listener hour for play music, a charge similar to that placed on terrestrial radio stations. The RIAA suggested a charge of $0.004 per streaming song, a rate based on fees it negotiated individually with 25 webcasters.
© Copyright 2006/2007. All rights
reserved by original source.
This page may contain copyrighted material, the use of which may not have
specifically authorized by the copyright owner. The material is made
available in the The Media Giraffe
Project's efforts to advance understanding of political, economic,
democracy, First Amendment, technology, journalism, community and justice
issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' as provided
by Section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
Chapter 1, Section 107, the material above is distributed without
profit to those
who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information
for research and educational purposes. The Media Giraffe Project has no
affiliation with the originator of this article, nor is the project
endorsed or sponsored by the article's originator. If you wish to use
copyrighted material from this site for purposes beyond fair use, you must
obtain permission from the copyright owner.
"The Media Giraffe Project was launched with the collaboration of The Giraffe Heroes
Project, a separate
organization that since 1982 has been moving people to stick their necks out for the common good."
Top of Page
| 
|
Google News Search
