Radio MSO Clear Channel eyes multiple legal challenges



SEARCH GIRAFFE PROSPECTS | MISSION | AUDIO/VIDEO RESOURCES | >MGP-FORUM | KEY QUOTES | HOME PAGE | ABOUT US | COLLABORATORS | BLOG RESOURCE SITE | BLOG NEWS SITE | MGP2006 ALUMNI NEWS | SUMMIT WIKI | CONTACT US | SUPPORT US | SPONSORS | REPORT A SIGHTING | Google News Search
Last Updated: Oct 12th, 2007 - 21:58:21 


Newshare.net
NEWS/RESEARCH TOPICS 
 
 A-About MGP
 
 A-CONFERENCE
 
 A-AUDIO/VIDEO resources
 
 A-Blogs
 
 A-Business Models
 
 A-Citizen journalism
 
 A-Democracy Futures
 
 A-Education & Training
 
 A-Ethics and Standards
 
 A-First Amendment / Free Speech / Press
 
 A-Giraffes at Work?
 
 A-Ideas-Trends-Innovation
 
 A-Journalism Futures
 
 A-KEY ESSAYS
 
 A-KEY QUOTATIONS
 
 A-Multimedia & Video Innovation
 
 A-Ownership, governance & management
 Antitrust/Monopolies
 Co-op or collaborative ownership
 Foundation / Employee ownership
 Profit vs. Public Service
 
 A-Podcasting & Audio
 
 A-VERBATIM-Interview Q&As
 
 Broadcasting/ Low Power FM
 
 Cable Local Access (PEG)
 
 Community wireless
 
 Conferences / Events
 
 Entertainment Industry
 
 Internet-Advertising
 
 Internet-Privacy-Online
 
 Internet-Technology
 
 Music-Future
 
 Online News Services
 
 Regulation: FCC and the courts
 
 Research / Demographics
 
 Resources
 
 Trackbacks/MGP in the news



Newshare.net
Antitrust/Monopolies
Newshare.net
Radio MSO Clear Channel eyes multiple legal challenges
By
Jun 28, 2002, 01:33

Email this article
 Printer friendly page
The largest U.S. radio broadcaster is accused in multiple forums of using its clout to unfair advantage. (View story By Leticia Williams at CBS.MarketWatch.COM) Now a congressman is trying to curb it with legislation.

Other links:

FEINGOLD INTRODUCES "COMPETITION IN RADIO AND CONCERT
INDUSTRIES ACT"


CLEAR CHANNEL COMMUNICATIONS RESPONDS TO FEINGOLD BILL

STATEMENT OF NAB PRESIDENT AND CEO EDWARD O. FRITTS IN
REACTION TO FEINGOLD BILL ON RADIO


ROSEN ON SEN. FEINGOLD'S COMPETITION IN RADIO AND CONCERT
INDUSTRIES ACT

Newshare.net


© Copyright 2006/2007. All rights reserved by original source.

This page may contain copyrighted material, the use of which may not have specifically authorized by the copyright owner. The material is made available in the The Media Giraffe Project's efforts to advance understanding of political, economic, democracy, First Amendment, technology, journalism, community and justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' as provided by Section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Chapter 1, Section 107, the material above is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. The Media Giraffe Project has no affiliation with the originator of this article, nor is the project endorsed or sponsored by the article's originator. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

"The Media Giraffe Project was launched with the collaboration of The Giraffe Heroes Project, a separate organization that since 1982 has been moving people to stick their necks out for the common good." Top of Page


Antitrust/Monopolies
Latest Postings
NPR examines pros-cons of cable-TV ownership in Lawrence, Kan.
Gannett, NYT moves in Detroit, Boston reviewed by antitrust enforcers
Radio MSO Clear Channel eyes multiple legal challenges
Sanders: Media conglomeration can't be ignored by Congress
U.S. Justice Dept. extends Sherman Act to cyberspace ventures
Feingold on concentration in music, radio, promotion industries
Newshare.net