QUOTES: Detroit exchanges seen as end of emotional attachment to newspapers and distraction from industry problems



SEARCH GIRAFFE PROSPECTS | MISSION | AUDIO/VIDEO RESOURCES | >MGP-FORUM | KEY QUOTES | HOME PAGE | ABOUT US | COLLABORATORS | BLOG RESOURCE SITE | BLOG NEWS SITE | MGP2006 ALUMNI NEWS | SUMMIT WIKI | CONTACT US | SUPPORT US | SPONSORS | REPORT A SIGHTING | Google News Search
Last Updated: Oct 12th, 2007 - 21:58:21 


Newshare.net
NEWS/RESEARCH TOPICS 
 
 A-About MGP
 
 A-CONFERENCE
 
 A-AUDIO/VIDEO resources
 
 A-Blogs
 
 A-Business Models
 
 A-Citizen journalism
 
 A-Democracy Futures
 
 A-Education & Training
 
 A-Ethics and Standards
 
 A-First Amendment / Free Speech / Press
 
 A-Giraffes at Work?
 
 A-Ideas-Trends-Innovation
 
 A-Journalism Futures
 
 A-KEY ESSAYS
 
 A-KEY QUOTATIONS
 
 A-Multimedia & Video Innovation
 
 A-Ownership, governance & management
 
 A-Podcasting & Audio
 
 A-VERBATIM-Interview Q&As
 
 Broadcasting/ Low Power FM
 
 Cable Local Access (PEG)
 
 Community wireless
 
 Conferences / Events
 
 Entertainment Industry
 
 Internet-Advertising
 
 Internet-Privacy-Online
 
 Internet-Technology
 
 Music-Future
 
 Online News Services
 
 Regulation: FCC and the courts
 
 Research / Demographics
 
 Resources
 
 Trackbacks/MGP in the news



Newshare.net
A-KEY QUOTATIONS
Newshare.net
QUOTES: Detroit exchanges seen as end of emotional attachment to newspapers and distraction from industry problems
By The New York Times
Aug 4, 2005, 11:20

Email this article
 Printer friendly page

The original version of this story may be found at the New York Times website:

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/04/business/media/04paper.html

Published: August 4, 2005

HEADLINE: 2 Huge Publishing Chains Swap Newspapers
 
By katharine Q. Seelye
The New York Times
 
Two media giants swapped newspapers in multiple cities yesterday. The companies, Knight Ridder and Gannett, called the transactions "an exchange of assets."

In one deal, Knight Ridder is giving up its interest in Detroit, selling The Free Press to Gannett. In turn, Gannett, which owns The Detroit News, is selling that paper to the MediaNews Group, headed by Dean Singleton.

In a separate deal, Knight Ridder is acquiring three papers from Gannett: The Idaho Statesman in Boise, The Olympian in Olympia, Wash., and The Bellingham Herald, also in Washington. Gannett is getting The Tallahassee Democrat in Florida, and an undisclosed amount of cash.

Details of the transactions, which are subject to regulatory approval, were not disclosed. Top editors at almost all the papers are being reshuffled.

The biggest papers affected were in Detroit. Like most newspapers, The News and The Free Press have lost circulation, and have also been involved in labor strife and suffered from the decline in the auto industry.

Knight Ridder has wanted out of Detroit for some time, largely because it has been the minority partner in a joint operating agreement with Gannett. "We feel the need to go our own way," Tony Ridder, chief executive of Knight Ridder, said in a statement. The operating agreement gave Gannett three members on the board, while Knight Ridder had two.

"There were things Gannett wanted to do and things Knight Ridder wanted to do," a Knight Ridder spokesman, Polk Laffoon, said. "We decided if we could develop an exit strategy that would leave us whole, it would be a positive thing for both parties."

The Free Press, with a daily circulation of 347,000, has been the Detroit area's dominant paper. The News sold 218,000 copies a day.

"At the end of the day," Mr. Laffoon said, "we did want to exit Detroit, but we wanted to do it in a way that mitigated the circulation loss and come away with an equivalent cash flow, so we were able to negotiate the swap."

While the circulation of the Idaho and Washington papers are less than that of The Free Press, he said, "the cash flow is better."

Asked what Gannett received in the deal, a spokeswoman, Tara Connell, said simply, "Detroit."

Knight Ridder's exit enhances Gannett's dominance there. Not only is it getting the higher-circulation Free Press, but it has renegotiated the joint operating agreement. Where once it split the profit in half with Knight Ridder, Ms. Connell said that Gannett would receive more than 70 percent in the arrangement with MediaNews Group.

Under the old arrangement, The Free Press and The News published jointly on Saturday and Sunday. Under the new one, both papers will still share back-office operations in advertising and circulation but will publish separate papers on Saturday. Perhaps most significantly, The News will leave Sunday, usually the most profitable day of the week, to The Free Press.

In exchange, Gannett is allowing MediaNews to make The News, published primarily in the afternoon, a full-fledged morning paper.

John Morton, a media analyst, said that in Detroit, "Gannett winds up with an overwhelming advantage." Despite the city's problems, he said, it is a big market, and the company can "cross-sell and cross-promote" with the papers it has acquired in suburban Detroit.

Similarly, Gannett wanted to acquire the Tallahassee paper because it fit into what Ms. Connell called its growing hub in Florida.

Mr. Morton said such a swap was highly unusual. While there have been bigger newspaper transactions - Tribune's acquisition of Times Mirror, for instance - he could not recall a deal in which so many papers had been traded.

He found that cause for lament. "This is further evidence," he said, "of how financially driven these companies are. The era of when newspaper companies had an emotional attachment to their properties has really withered away."

Colby Atwood, vice president of Borrell Associates, a media research firm, viewed the swap as an act of desperation. "Elaborate property-swapping deals are kind of a distraction from the main thing that's going on in the industry," he said, "and that's declining readership and declining share of ad revenue.

"People have a relationship with their newspaper, and if they feel that it's just a device that a giant corporation is using to make money, they feel taken advantage of. This doesn't do much to build brand loyalty, and that's what newspapers need more of, not less of."

Newshare.net


© Copyright 2006/2007. All rights reserved by original source.

This page may contain copyrighted material, the use of which may not have specifically authorized by the copyright owner. The material is made available in the The Media Giraffe Project's efforts to advance understanding of political, economic, democracy, First Amendment, technology, journalism, community and justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' as provided by Section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Chapter 1, Section 107, the material above is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. The Media Giraffe Project has no affiliation with the originator of this article, nor is the project endorsed or sponsored by the article's originator. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

"The Media Giraffe Project was launched with the collaboration of The Giraffe Heroes Project, a separate organization that since 1982 has been moving people to stick their necks out for the common good." Top of Page


A-KEY QUOTATIONS
Latest Postings
Clark: Time for new "stewardship" in newspaper executive ranks?
QUOTE: James Carroll on a free press and the communal self-awareness that makes democracy work
QUOTES: Detroit exchanges seen as end of emotional attachment to newspapers and distraction from industry problems
Civics test should be a high-school requirement
QUOTE: Kovach on the link between news/journalism and democracy/community
QUOTE: Joseph Pulitzer on the function of the press
The U.S. Supreme Court in 1936 -- fettering the press "fetters ourselves"
Newshare.net