Microsoft chooses China business over free speech in blog censorship?



SEARCH GIRAFFE PROSPECTS | MISSION | AUDIO/VIDEO RESOURCES | >MGP-FORUM | KEY QUOTES | HOME PAGE | ABOUT US | COLLABORATORS | BLOG RESOURCE SITE | BLOG NEWS SITE | MGP2006 ALUMNI NEWS | SUMMIT WIKI | CONTACT US | SUPPORT US | SPONSORS | REPORT A SIGHTING | Google News Search
Last Updated: Oct 12th, 2007 - 21:58:21 


Newshare.net
NEWS/RESEARCH TOPICS 
 
 A-About MGP
 
 A-CONFERENCE
 
 A-AUDIO/VIDEO resources
 
 A-Blogs
 
 A-Business Models
 
 A-Citizen journalism
 
 A-Democracy Futures
 
 A-Education & Training
 
 A-Ethics and Standards
 
 A-First Amendment / Free Speech / Press
 Access & Control Rights
 Copyright & Commons
 
 A-Giraffes at Work?
 
 A-Ideas-Trends-Innovation
 
 A-Journalism Futures
 
 A-KEY ESSAYS
 
 A-KEY QUOTATIONS
 
 A-Multimedia & Video Innovation
 
 A-Ownership, governance & management
 
 A-Podcasting & Audio
 
 A-VERBATIM-Interview Q&As
 
 Broadcasting/ Low Power FM
 
 Cable Local Access (PEG)
 
 Community wireless
 
 Conferences / Events
 
 Entertainment Industry
 
 Internet-Advertising
 
 Internet-Privacy-Online
 
 Internet-Technology
 
 Music-Future
 
 Online News Services
 
 Regulation: FCC and the courts
 
 Research / Demographics
 
 Resources
 
 Trackbacks/MGP in the news



Newshare.net
A-First Amendment / Free Speech / Press
Newshare.net
Microsoft chooses China business over free speech in blog censorship?
By Bill Densmore
Jan 10, 2006, 20:48

Email this article
 Printer friendly page

Also see Media Giraffe Profile of Bill Xia.

Microsoft Corp. appears to have made a deliberate choice to favor a continued business relationship with China over free speech after it shut down a Chinese blog hosted on MSN Spaces. Now a proposal is circulating in Washington, D.C. -- should the U.S. forbid such decisions?

Rebecca MacKinnon of the Berkman Center at Harvard University first noticed the move last week, and since it has been covered by the New York Times and others.  MacKinnon first noticed the takedown and blogged about it  on Jan. 3. A former CNN China correspondent, MacKinnon wrote that the censored blogger, Zhao Jing,

 " . . . is one of China’s edgiest journalistic bloggers, often pushing at the boundaries of what is acceptable. (See a recent profile of him here, and an interview with Anti here.)

"His old blog at the U.S.-hosted Blog-city is believed to have caused the Chinese authorities to block all Blog-city blogs. In the final days of December, Anti became a vocal supporter of journalists at the Beijing Daily News who walked off the job after the top editors were fired for their increasingly daring investigative coverage, including some recent reporting on the recent police shootings of village protestors in the Southern China"

The Camden, Maine-based Institute for Global Ethics also is following up and posted here, observing: 

"The action came amid criticism by free-speech groups, which have accused Microsoft and other major technology companies of helping China suppress free speech in exchange for entrée into that nation's enormous Internet market."

On Jan. 10, at the British site journalism.co.uk, contributor Robert Andrews wrote:

"Bill Gates' company is one of several to operate filters in China that censor blog posts containing words like "democracy" and "Tibet independence"; last year, Chinese authorities also jailed a journalist for sending a Yahoo! e-mail about human rights violations after the portal giant divulged the writer's account details.

"Now Reporters Sans Frontiers (RSF), an organisation that protects press freedoms, has handed Washington DC legislators a code containing "six concrete ways to make [American] companies behave ethically" in repressive countries."

The Institute for Global Ethics post provided several other current and historical links to the controversy:

Sources: AFP, Jan. 7 -- New York Times, Jan. 6 -- Wall Street Journal (free feature) Jan. 6 -- AP, Jan. 6 -- Australia Sunday Times, Jan. 6 -- Melbourne Herald-Sun, Jan. 6 -- ZDNet (U.K.), Jan. 6 -- London Telegraph, Jan. 6.

For more information: Related Newsline story, Jan. 2 -- Related Newsline story, Nov. 14, 2005 -- Related Newsline story, Sept. 26, 2005 -- Related Newsline story, Sept. 12, 2005.

 

 

Newshare.net


© Copyright 2006/2007. All rights reserved by original source.

This page may contain copyrighted material, the use of which may not have specifically authorized by the copyright owner. The material is made available in the The Media Giraffe Project's efforts to advance understanding of political, economic, democracy, First Amendment, technology, journalism, community and justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' as provided by Section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Chapter 1, Section 107, the material above is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. The Media Giraffe Project has no affiliation with the originator of this article, nor is the project endorsed or sponsored by the article's originator. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

"The Media Giraffe Project was launched with the collaboration of The Giraffe Heroes Project, a separate organization that since 1982 has been moving people to stick their necks out for the common good." Top of Page


A-First Amendment / Free Speech / Press
Latest Postings
Temple's Renee Hobbs developing handbook on copyright fair use
Conyers, Hall ask Bush administration to withdraw Balco subpoenas of Chronicle reporters
"Fake news" battle heats up via letter to the FCC; both sides allege distortions
First Amendment discussion increases in America's classrooms, Knight study finds
Blogger Josh Wolf awaits full appeals court hearing on issue of responding to subpoena for videotape
Broadcast news veteran Bill Kurtis, in Chicago speech, compares news with junk food and charges journalists to "do your job"
Center for Digital Democracy director lays out arguments in favor of "network neutrality" in Nation article
Net neutrality backers weigh tactic to demonstrate slowing of internet to congressional staffers and targetted media
Did Comcast "censor" a segment critical of its customer service?
When politicians exchange email and post to blogs do they violate open-meeting laws?
Newshare.net