When politicians exchange email and post to blogs do they violate open-meeting laws?



SEARCH GIRAFFE PROSPECTS | MISSION | AUDIO/VIDEO RESOURCES | >MGP-FORUM | KEY QUOTES | HOME PAGE | ABOUT US | COLLABORATORS | BLOG RESOURCE SITE | BLOG NEWS SITE | MGP2006 ALUMNI NEWS | SUMMIT WIKI | CONTACT US | SUPPORT US | SPONSORS | REPORT A SIGHTING | Google News Search
Last Updated: Oct 12th, 2007 - 21:58:21 


Newshare.net
NEWS/RESEARCH TOPICS 
 
 A-About MGP
 
 A-CONFERENCE
 
 A-AUDIO/VIDEO resources
 
 A-Blogs
 
 A-Business Models
 
 A-Citizen journalism
 
 A-Democracy Futures
 
 A-Education & Training
 
 A-Ethics and Standards
 
 A-First Amendment / Free Speech / Press
 Access & Control Rights
 Copyright & Commons
 
 A-Giraffes at Work?
 
 A-Ideas-Trends-Innovation
 
 A-Journalism Futures
 
 A-KEY ESSAYS
 
 A-KEY QUOTATIONS
 
 A-Multimedia & Video Innovation
 
 A-Ownership, governance & management
 
 A-Podcasting & Audio
 
 A-VERBATIM-Interview Q&As
 
 Broadcasting/ Low Power FM
 
 Cable Local Access (PEG)
 
 Community wireless
 
 Conferences / Events
 
 Entertainment Industry
 
 Internet-Advertising
 
 Internet-Privacy-Online
 
 Internet-Technology
 
 Music-Future
 
 Online News Services
 
 Regulation: FCC and the courts
 
 Research / Demographics
 
 Resources
 
 Trackbacks/MGP in the news



Newshare.net
A-First Amendment / Free Speech / Press
Newshare.net
When politicians exchange email and post to blogs do they violate open-meeting laws?
By
Mar 4, 2006, 10:43

Email this article
 Printer friendly page

A North Adams, Mass., law firm has provided an advisory letter to the city councilor in the community of 14,000 residents, essentially say they do not violate the Massachusetts Open Meeting Act when they exchange posts on weblogs. Attorney John B. DeRosa writes in a Feb. 24, 2006 letter that so long as the the exchanges are not deliberative and are not executed with the intent of circumventing the law, they are probably lawful.  The letter is significant because open-meeting laws in most states were written before popular use of the Internet and there has been little case law on the subject. The North Adams Transcript covered the letter and issue.

Newshare.net


© Copyright 2006/2007. All rights reserved by original source.

This page may contain copyrighted material, the use of which may not have specifically authorized by the copyright owner. The material is made available in the The Media Giraffe Project's efforts to advance understanding of political, economic, democracy, First Amendment, technology, journalism, community and justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' as provided by Section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Chapter 1, Section 107, the material above is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. The Media Giraffe Project has no affiliation with the originator of this article, nor is the project endorsed or sponsored by the article's originator. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

"The Media Giraffe Project was launched with the collaboration of The Giraffe Heroes Project, a separate organization that since 1982 has been moving people to stick their necks out for the common good." Top of Page


A-First Amendment / Free Speech / Press
Latest Postings
Temple's Renee Hobbs developing handbook on copyright fair use
Conyers, Hall ask Bush administration to withdraw Balco subpoenas of Chronicle reporters
"Fake news" battle heats up via letter to the FCC; both sides allege distortions
First Amendment discussion increases in America's classrooms, Knight study finds
Blogger Josh Wolf awaits full appeals court hearing on issue of responding to subpoena for videotape
Broadcast news veteran Bill Kurtis, in Chicago speech, compares news with junk food and charges journalists to "do your job"
Center for Digital Democracy director lays out arguments in favor of "network neutrality" in Nation article
Net neutrality backers weigh tactic to demonstrate slowing of internet to congressional staffers and targetted media
Did Comcast "censor" a segment critical of its customer service?
When politicians exchange email and post to blogs do they violate open-meeting laws?
Newshare.net