HOME PAGE | ABOUT US | COLLABORATORS | SEARCH GIRAFFE PROFILES | BLOG RESOURCE SITE | CONTACT US | SUPPORT US | REPORT A SIGHTING
Last Updated: Oct 12th, 2007 - 21:58:21 
Newshare.net

Newspapers, Daily
U.S. newspaper decline results from abandonment of news that affects mainstream America, veteran editor Tom Stites says
By Bill Densmore
Jun 30, 2006, 03:10

If AmFrontpage_1erica's daily-newspaper publishers are wondering about causes of circulation decline, they should look at the content of their product, says Tom Stites, a veteran major-daily editor who now works for the Unitarian Church in Boston.  In the last decade, according to Pew Research data analyzed by Stites, a stark pattern has emerged: While circulation declines have been across the board, they are far more pronounced among middle- and low-income readers.  "Why?" asked Stites in the text of a speech given June 30 at the first Media Giraffe Project summit at the University of Massachusetts Amherst  Stites suggests the answer lies in the type of stories papers publish -- appealing more to the upscale, moneyed demographic favored by advertisers. Imagine how a daily newspaper looks to a single mother with three children?  To illustrate his point, he took one day of The Boston Globe -- not because the paper is unique, but because, in his view, it is typical. "My purpose has not been to pick on The Globe," he writes. "Given changes in retailing and thus advertising, the changes in newspapers have been inevitable."

Is Stites' analysis fresh? Is it right? What should the nation's editors do?

  Tom Stites

Media Giraffe Project advisor Dan Gillmor has now posted an updated version of the text at his Center for Citizen Journalism site. You can also choose a PDF DOWNLOAD VERSION

Some inciteful blog posts about Stites' talk:
http://retrovirus.com/brunch/2006/07/reading-and-democracy/

HERE ARE THUMBNAILS OF THE GRAPHICS:

Stiteshomeprices Stiteslobster Stitesretirement

Stitesshadesgreen

StitestugboatStiteswcrbStitesbsoStitesbetterday 


Newshare.net
© Copyright 2006-2007. All rights reserved by original source.

This article is copyrighted material, the use of which may not have specifically authorized by the copyright owner. The material is made available in the The Media Giraffe Project's efforts to advance understanding of political, economic, democracy, First Amendment, technology, journalism, community and justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' any as provided by Section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Chapter 1, Section 107, the material above is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. The Media Giraffe Project has no affiliation with the originator of this article, nor is the project endorsed or sponsored by the article's originator. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.