HOME PAGE | ABOUT US | COLLABORATORS | SEARCH GIRAFFE PROFILES | BLOG RESOURCE SITE | CONTACT US | SUPPORT US | REPORT A SIGHTING Last Updated: Oct 12th, 2007 - 21:58:21 |
Encryption & copyright
Danish court decision arouses fears of ban on "deep linking"
By Newshare staff
Jul 6, 2002, 12:28
A Danish court has upheld a ban on so-called "deep linking" by one website to another -- such as in this summary item.
This article is copyrighted material, the use of which may not have
specifically authorized by the copyright owner. The material is made
available in the The Media Giraffe
Project's efforts to advance understanding of political, economic,
democracy, First Amendment, technology, journalism, community and justice
issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' any as provided
by Section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
Chapter 1, Section 107, the material above is distributed without profit to those
who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information
for research and educational purposes. The Media Giraffe Project has no
affiliation with the originator of this article, nor is the project
endorsed or sponsored by the article's originator. If you wish to use
copyrighted material from this site for purposes beyond fair use, you must
obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Read CNET News.COM's account.
The impact of the decision is unclear, but the legal issue of deep linking is raising concerns among U.S. First Amendment watchers, CNET News reports.
What do you think? You can read and post comments at Geek.COM.
You can view comments on the Online-News discussion list about the topic.
And you can read web usability expert Jakob Nielsen's advice about deep linking. In an April 7, 2000 commentary at the New York Times Online, analyst Carl S. Kaplan said the legality of deep linking is deeply ambiguous.
Brad Templeton, a founder of the ClariNet news service and director of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, has created his own page on the subject, on which he says, "I, and many other people initially had the intuitive feeling that it could never be a violation of copyright to make a link to a web page. Later, I've come to think that this might be wrong in some cases, though only those where you've been ordered not to."
Templeton also refers people to another useful page on the controversy.
Other useful pages incude:
http://www.selu.edu/Academics/FacultyExcellence/Pattie/DeepLinking/
http://news.zdnet.co.uk/story/0,,t269-s2118517,00.html